{"id":19288,"date":"2024-11-07T10:46:58","date_gmt":"2024-11-07T09:46:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inmuno.es\/index.php\/2024\/11\/07\/immune-response-to-topical-sodium-lauryl-sulfate-differs-from-classical-irritant-and-allergic-contact-dermatitis-valuemarvin-nusken-fabian-heinemeier-silke-sabina-matzke-patryk-porebs\/"},"modified":"2024-11-07T10:46:58","modified_gmt":"2024-11-07T09:46:58","slug":"immune-response-to-topical-sodium-lauryl-sulfate-differs-from-classical-irritant-and-allergic-contact-dermatitis-valuemarvin-nusken-fabian-heinemeier-silke-sabina-matzke-patryk-porebs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inmuno.es\/index.php\/2024\/11\/07\/immune-response-to-topical-sodium-lauryl-sulfate-differs-from-classical-irritant-and-allergic-contact-dermatitis-valuemarvin-nusken-fabian-heinemeier-silke-sabina-matzke-patryk-porebs\/","title":{"rendered":"Immune response to topical sodium lauryl sulfate differs from classical irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. [[{&#8220;value&#8221;:&#8221;Marvin N\u00fcsken, \nFabian Heinemeier, \nSilke Sabina Matzke, \nPatryk Porebski, \nSusann Forkel, \nPrasad Dasari, \nAndrea Braun, \nAndreas Erich Zautner, \nMichael Peter Sch\u00f6n, \nTimo Buhl&#8221;}]]"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We investigated sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS)-skin reactions because of its relevance in patch tests of patients, and we compared its effects with ACD-inducing oxazolone (OXA) and ICD-inducing croton oil (CrO). SLS-induced contact dermatitis differed from classical ACD and ICD, as it elicited less pronounced immune alterations.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<h2>Abstract<\/h2>\n<p>Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is used as a control irritant in patch testing for allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). However, up to 20% of those tested react to SLS, whereby the pathophysiological basis of this reaction is still unclear. To mimic patch test reactions, we repeatedly applied SLS to the skin of wild-type mice. Reactions were compared with those in a classical ACD model induced by oxazolone and an irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) model induced by croton oil. Skin inflammation was assessed with ear thickness measurements, immunohistochemistry, qRT-PCR, and flow cytometry. Topical SLS treatment was further investigated in Flg\/Hrnr<br \/>\n\u2212\/\u2212, Myd88\/Tlr3<br \/>\n\u2212\/\u2212, and Rag1<br \/>\n\u2212\/\u2212 mouse models. All three compounds caused ear swelling with different courses. Oxazolone treatment, compared with the ICD model, resulted in a greater influx of immune cells (CD4+, MHCII+, CD11b+). Similarly, SLS did not induce immune cell infiltration or expression of selected inflammatory and regulatory cytokines. SLS induced the most pronounced keratinocyte proliferation. Compared with wild-type mice, topical SLS application did not increase ear swelling in skin barrier deficient Flg\/Hrnr<br \/>\n\u2212\/\u2212 mice, but led to significantly delayed swelling in mice with defects in innate or adaptive immune functions (Myd88\/Tlr3<br \/>\n\u2212\/\u2212, Rag1<br \/>\n\u2212\/\u2212). SLS-induced contact dermatitis differed from classical ACD and ICD, as it elicited less pronounced immune alterations. Skin barrier impairment does not affect SLS-induced contact dermatitis, whereas both innate and adaptive components are involved in SLS skin reactions.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We investigated sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS)-skin reactions because of its relevance in patch tests of patients, and we compared its effects with ACD-inducing oxazolone (OXA) and ICD-inducing croton oil (CrO). SLS-induced contact dermatitis differed from classical ACD and ICD, as it elicited less pronounced immune alterations. Abstract Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is used as a &#8230; <a title=\"Immune response to topical sodium lauryl sulfate differs from classical irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. [[{&#8220;value&#8221;:&#8221;Marvin N\u00fcsken, \nFabian Heinemeier, \nSilke Sabina Matzke, \nPatryk Porebski, \nSusann Forkel, \nPrasad Dasari, \nAndrea Braun, \nAndreas Erich Zautner, \nMichael Peter Sch\u00f6n, \nTimo Buhl&#8221;}]]\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/inmuno.es\/index.php\/2024\/11\/07\/immune-response-to-topical-sodium-lauryl-sulfate-differs-from-classical-irritant-and-allergic-contact-dermatitis-valuemarvin-nusken-fabian-heinemeier-silke-sabina-matzke-patryk-porebs\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about Immune response to topical sodium lauryl sulfate differs from classical irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. [[{&#8220;value&#8221;:&#8221;Marvin N\u00fcsken, \nFabian Heinemeier, \nSilke Sabina Matzke, \nPatryk Porebski, \nSusann Forkel, \nPrasad Dasari, \nAndrea Braun, \nAndreas Erich Zautner, \nMichael Peter Sch\u00f6n, \nTimo Buhl&#8221;}]]\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[112,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19288","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-european-journal-of-immunology","category-publicaciones"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inmuno.es\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19288","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inmuno.es\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inmuno.es\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inmuno.es\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19288"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/inmuno.es\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19288\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inmuno.es\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19288"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inmuno.es\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19288"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inmuno.es\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19288"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}